Scintigraphy in the Evaluation of Osteoarthritis of the Canine Stifle Joint

J. F. Innes; A. R. S. Barr; M. W. Patteson; P. A. Dieppe

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1632503

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Table of Contents

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1996; 09(02): 53-9
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632503

Original Research

Schattauer GmbH

Scintigraphy in the Evaluation of Osteoarthritis of the Canine Stifle Joint

Relationship with Clinical, Radiographic and Surgical Observations

J. F. Innes

¹From the Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol, UK

,

A. R. S. Barr

¹From the Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol, UK

,

M. W. Patteson

¹From the Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol, UK

,

P. A. Dieppe

²Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Summary

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of scintigraphy in the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the canine stifle joint. Forty dogs with osteoarthritis of the stifle joint were examined scintigraphically using ^99mTechnetium hydroxymethylene diphosphonate (^99mTc-HMDP). Early (perfusion) and late (bone) scans of both stifle joints from each dog were obtained. Preliminary review of scans suggested three grades of early phase isotope retention (0, 1, 2) and two abnormal patterns of late phase retention (“generalised” and “marginal”). The reproducibility of these gradings/groupings was tested using unweighted kappa (ĸ) tests and found to be good (ĸ = 0.58) to excellent (ĸ = 0.93). Of 73 early phase scans, 35 (48%) showed some abnormality as did 61 (85%) of 72 late phase scans. Where both early and late phase scans were available (n = 65), 58 (89%) were considered abnormal. Results of scans were compared to clinical, radiographic and surgical observations. Scintigraphy was associated with clinical and radiographic data (ρ <0.05) but also appears to provide additional information. The marginal pattern was associated with bodyweight (ρ = 0.018), instability (odds ratio [OR] = 8.82), osteophytosis (OR = 18.64) and intra-articular mineralisation (OR = 31.09). Although not reaching statistical significance, the marginal pattern tended to be associated with articular cartilage fibrillation as observed at arthrotomy. The generalised pattern was seen in the absence of instability, effusion and osteophytosis. Scintigraphy appears to be a useful method for staging osteoarthritis of the canine stifle joint, as well as providing a means to study disease mechanisms.

Osteoarthritic canine stifle joints were examined scinti-graphically (early and late phase scans), clinically, radio-graphically and visually at surgery. Abnormal scan grades and patterns were defined, and the reproducibility of these gradings/groupings was tested and found to be good to excellent. Scintigraphic findings were associated with other disease measures but it appears that scintigraphy supplies additional information. Scintigraphy provides a useful method with which to investigate osteoarthritis of the canine stifle joint.

Keywords

Osteoarthritis - scintigraphy - stifle - dog

Full Text

References

REFERENCES
1 Bennett D. Joints and Joint Diseases. In: Canine Orthopaedics. Whittick W. (ed) Lea and Febiger: Philadelphia; 1990: 776-8.
2 Tirgari M, Vaughan LC. Arthritis of the canine stifle joint. Vet Rec 1975; 96: 394-9.
3 Vasseur PB, Berry CR. Progression of stifle osteoarthrosis following reconstruction of the cranial cruciate ligament in 21 dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1992; 28: 129-36.
4 Elkins AD, Pechman R, Kearney MT, Herron M. A retrospective study evaluating the degree of degenerative joint diseases in the stifle joint of dogs following surgical repair of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1991; 27: 533-40.
5 Bennett D, Tennant B, Lewis DG, Baughan J, May C, Carter S. A reappraisal of anterior cruciate ligament disease in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1988; 29: 275-97.
6 McCrae F, Shouls J, Dieppe P, Watt I. Scintigraphic assessment of osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Ann Rheum Dis 1992; 51: 938-42.
7 Dorchak JD, Barrack RL, Alexander AH, Dye SF, Dresser TP. Radionuclide imaging of the knee with chronic anterior cruciate ligament tear. Ortho Rev 1993; 22: 1233-41.
8 McCrae F, Palmer M, Shouls J, Watt I, Dieppe P. Scintigraphic assessment of synovial and bone responses after intra-articular yttrium⁹⁰therapy. Br J Rheum 1988; 27: 23
9 Christensen SB. Osteoarthrosis. Changes of bone, cartilage and synovial membrane in relation to bone scintigraphy. Acta Ortho Scand Suppl 1985; 56: 1-43.
10 Allhands R, Kalfelz F, Lust G. Scintigraphic studies of degenerative hip disease in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1976; 12: 792-6.
11 Allhands R, Kallfelz F, Lust G. Radionuclide joint imaging: an ancilary technique in the diagnosis of canine hip dysplasia. Am J Vet Res 1980; 41: 230-3.
12 Metcalf M. Preliminary clinical use of combined blood pool and bone phase radionuclide imaging in dogs. Vet Radiol 1985; 26: 117-22.
13 Thrall D, Badertscher R, Lewis R, Losonsky J. Canine bone scanning: its use as a diagnostic tool for canine hip dysplasia. Am J Vet Res 1977; 38: 1433-7.
14 Fallon RK, Tomlinson JL. Prognostic indicators in 80 consecutive cases of cranial cruciate ligament rupture: a prospective study. Vet Surg 1986; 15: 118
15 Lohmander LS, Roos H. Knee ligament injury, surgery and osteoarthrosis. Truth or consequences?. Acta Ortho Scand 1994; 65: 605-9.
16 Fleiss J. The measurement of interrater agreement. In: Statistical methods for rates and proportions. J. Wiley and Sons; New York: 1981: 213-33.
17 Hamerman D. The biology of osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 1322-30.
18 Felson D. The course of osteoarthritis and factors that affect it. In: Rheum Dis Clin N Am, 19 (3). Moskowitz R. (ed) W. B. Saunders; Philadelphia: 1993: 607-15.
19 Dieppe P. Osteoathritis: the scale and scope of the clinical problem. In: Osteoarthritis: current research and prospects for pharmacologic intervention. Russell R, Dieppe P. (eds) IBC Technical Services; London: 1991: 4-23.
20 Innes J. Diagnosis and treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs. In Pract 1995; 17: 102-9.
21 Dieppe P, Kirwan J. The localization of osteoarthritis. Br J Rheum 1994; 33: 201-4.
22 Pond M, Nuki G. Experimentally induced osteoarthritis in the dog. Ann Rheum Dis 1973; 32: 387-8.
23 Marshall J. Periarticular osteophytes: Initiation and formation in the knee of the dog. Clin Orthop 1969; 62: 37-47.
24 Gilbertson E. Development of periarticular osteophytes in experimentally induced osteoarthritis in the dog. A study using microradiographic, microangiographic and fluorescent bone-labelling techniques. Ann Rheum Dis 1975; 34: 12-25.
25 Hoffer P, Genant H. Radionuclide joint imaging. Semin Nucl Med 1976; 6: 121-37.
26 Dieppe P, Cushnaghan J, Young P, Kirwan J. Prediction of the Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Osteoarthritis of the Knee by Bone Scintigraphy. Ann Rheum Dis 1993; 52: 557-63.
27 Heffron L, Campbell J. Osteophyte formation in the canine stifle joint following treatment for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament. J Small Anim Pract 1979; 20: 603-11.
28 Gestel M. Diagnostic accuracy of stifle arthroscopy in the dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1985; 21: 757-63.
29 Murray I, Dixon J, Kohan L. SPECT for acute knee pain. Clin Nuc Med 1990; 15: 828-40.
30 Marymont J, Lynch M, Henning C. Evaluation of meniscus tears of the knee by radionuclide imaging. Am J Sp Med 1983; 11: 432-5.
31 O’Connor B, Brandt K. Neurogenic factors in the etiopathogenesis of osteoarthritis. In: Rheum Dis Clin N Am, 19 (3). Moskowitz R. (ed) Philadelphia: 1993: 581-605.